[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h61qnslg.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 10:25:31 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra
<vigneshr@...com>, "De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>, Thomas
Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, "Vivi,
Rodrigo"
<rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie
<airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Jani Nikula
<jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Joonas Lahtinen
<joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
"Poosa, Karthik" <karthik.poosa@...el.com>, "Abliyev, Reuven"
<reuven.abliyev@...el.com>, "Weil, Oren jer" <oren.jer.weil@...el.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/12] mtd: core: always create master device
Hello Alexander,
On 06/05/2025 at 11:07:21 GMT, "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/03/2025 at 17:26:12 +02, Alexander Usyskin
>> <alexander.usyskin@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Create master device without partition when
>> > CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER flag is unset.
>> >
>> > This streamlines device tree and allows to anchor
>> > runtime power management on master device in all cases.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
>>
>> Applied to mtd/next. Thanks!
>>
>> Miquèl
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Miquel, would you pick patches from this series for files that are
> in the mtd tree?
> I can send separate patch series for this.
> In this case the i915/Xe patches can be merged in parallel via Xe
> tree.
I read several times that these patches should go through drm somehow,
so I provided my Ack. I do not think build would be broken if patch 1
goes through mtd and the others through drm anyway, especially since drm
has some structural slowness which means once applied to drm-misc(-next)
they may be part of the main tree a release later (iiuc).
However, I might drop this patch and reapply the one from v9, because I
apparently messed up with the version count. There is no action required
on your side.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists