[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCG0ykZt-DcEG2kr@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:43:54 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>,
Rahul Pathak <rpathak@...tanamicro.com>,
Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/23] ACPI: property: Refactor
acpi_fwnode_get_reference_args()
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 07:09:30PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
>
> Currently acpi_fwnode_get_reference_args() calls the public function
> __acpi_node_get_property_reference() which ignores the nargs_prop
> parameter. To fix this, make __acpi_node_get_property_reference() to
> call the static acpi_fwnode_get_reference() so that callers of
> fwnode_get_reference_args() can still pass a valid property name to
> fetch the number of arguments.
...
> +static int acpi_fwnode_get_reference_args(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> + const char *prop, const char *nargs_prop,
Why prop and not propname?
> + unsigned int args_count, unsigned int index,
> + struct fwnode_reference_args *args)
...
> - ret = acpi_data_get_property(data, propname, ACPI_TYPE_ANY, &obj);
> + ret = acpi_data_get_property(data, prop, ACPI_TYPE_ANY, &obj);
Ditto.
Sounds like an unneeded churn.
> if (ret)
> return ret == -EINVAL ? -ENOENT : -EINVAL;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists