[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCNctHq6K7uqFF05@mai.linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 16:52:36 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
Cc: Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Donghoon Yu <hoony.yu@...sung.com>,
Hosung Kim <hosung0.kim@...sung.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Add module support
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 05:48:41PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 9:50 AM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 04:33:57PM -0700, Will McVicker wrote:
> > > From: Donghoon Yu <hoony.yu@...sung.com>
> > >
> > > On Arm64 platforms the Exynos MCT driver can be built as a module. On
> > > boot (and even after boot) the arch_timer is used as the clocksource and
> > > tick timer. Once the MCT driver is loaded, it can be used as the wakeup
> > > source for the arch_timer.
> >
> > From a previous thread where there is no answer:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/c1e8abec-680c-451d-b5df-f687291aa413@linaro.org/
> >
> > I don't feel comfortable with changing the clocksource / clockevent drivers to
> > a module for the reasons explained in the aforementionned thread.
>
> I wasn't CC'ed on that, but to address a few of your points:
>
> > I have some concerns about this kind of changes:
> >
> > * the core code may not be prepared for that, so loading / unloading
> > the modules with active timers may result into some issues
>
> That's a fair concern, but permanent modules (which are loaded but not
> unloaded) shouldn't suffer this issue. I recognize having modules be
> fully unloadable is generally cleaner and preferred, but I also see
> the benefit of allowing permanent modules to be one-way loaded so a
> generic/distro kernel shared between lots of different platforms
> doesn't need to be bloated with drivers that aren't used everywhere.
> Obviously any single driver doesn't make a huge difference, but all
> the small drivers together does add up.
Perhaps using module_platform_driver_probe() should do the trick with
some scripts updated for my git hooks to check
module_platform_driver() is not used.
[ ... ]
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists