[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae22b0df-f4ab-4567-b3b4-35c1c6b5233a@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 21:05:15 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, xu xin <xu.xin16@....com.cn>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add mm ksm section
On 13.05.25 20:17, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 06:52:27PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 13.05.25 18:17, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>>> As part of the ongoing efforts to sub-divide memory management
>>> maintainership and reviewership, establish a section for Kernel Samepage
>>> Merging (KSM) and add appropriate maintainers and reviewers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> REVIEWERS NOTES:
>>>
>>> I took a look through git blame, past commits, etc. and came up with what
>>> seems to be a reasonable list of people here, if you don't feel you ought
>>> to be here, or if you feel anybody is missing (including yourself!) let me
>>> know :)
>>>
>>> David has kindly already agreed to be co-maintainer for this section.
>>>
>>> MAINTAINERS | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 80aa09f2e735..5ea2020acf84 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -15567,6 +15567,21 @@ W: http://www.linux-mm.org
>>> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
>>> F: mm/gup.c
>>>
>>> +MEMORY MANAGEMENT - KSM (Kernel Samepage Merging)
>>> +M: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>>> +M: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>>> +R: xu xin <xu.xin16@....com.cn>
>>> +R: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>
>>
>> I don't see a single RB from Chengming Zhou, and a single one from xu xin
>> ... :)
>
> Yeah sorry this is fuzzy but git blame mm/ksm.c for 2025 gives you _very little_
> activity in general, a series fro Xu and a series from yourself :) Xu's series
> was... acked by you :P
Yes, 2025 so far had little activity (fortunately).
>
> Equally with Chengming based on other files listed here, I went and checked to
> see if there were substantive series as a sort of 'fuzzy matcher' which might
> imply a review interest here, and see there did seem to be some.
>
> But obviously if anybody feels any entry here is inappropriate, or on the other
> hand anybody was missed off, more than happy to rectify on the un-RFC!
I guess my point is, as a submitter you expect that people that are
listed under R: that you are supposed to CC would actually ... review? :D
In that case, I would prefer to have actual reviewers there. If there
are none, then there should be none listed.
Of course, If Xu and Chengming do *want* to actively review KSM code
changes, I would be more than happy to list them.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists