linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf test: Fix LBR test by ignoring idle task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aCOvp9CRhmdwD5yK@x1>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 17:46:31 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf test: Fix LBR test by ignoring idle task

On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:58:07AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 2:30 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> > I found 'perf record LBR tests' failing due to empty branch stacks.

<SNIP>

> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
 
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>

Thanks, applied to perf-tools-next,

- Arnaldo