[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c803b78-b6be-425d-a747-85e4c69b4f3d@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 22:02:55 -0700
From: Xin Li <xin@...or.com>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/fred: Allow variable-sized event frame
On 5/12/2025 5:10 AM, Brian Gerst wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 5:30 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 11:43:52PM -0700, Xin Li (Intel) wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -#define INIT_THREAD_INFO(tsk) \
>>> -{ \
>>> - .flags = 0, \
>>> +extern unsigned long __top_init_kernel_stack[];
>>> +
>>> +#define INIT_THREAD_INFO(tsk) \
>>> +{ \
>>> + .flags = 0, \
>>> + .user_pt_regs = (struct pt_regs *)__top_init_kernel_stack, \
>>
>> Should that not have a -1 on or something?
>
> No, that symbol already accounts for subtracting the size of pt_regs.
Thanks for your answer :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists