[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250513154845.7c03dbe2@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 15:48:45 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Pawan Gupta
<pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst
between commit:
1ac116ce6468 ("Documentation: x86/bugs/its: Add ITS documentation")
from Linus' tree and commit:
4804f5ad5d63 ("x86/cpu: Add "Old Microcode" docs to hw-vuln toctree")
from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst
index ce296b8430fc,cf1511145927..000000000000
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst
@@@ -23,4 -23,4 +23,5 @@@ are configurable at compile, boot or ru
gather_data_sampling
reg-file-data-sampling
rsb
+ indirect-target-selection
+ old_microcode
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists