[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCMYrgd9DDQl7G1W@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 12:02:22 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@...gle.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v3 00/21] x86: strict separation of startup code
* Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 09:08:35PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> >
> > !!! Boot tested on non-SEV guest ONLY !!!!
>
> ...
>
> > !!! Boot tested on non-SEV guest ONLY !!!!
> >
> > Again, I will need to lean on Tom to determine whether this breaks
> > SEV-SNP guest boot. As I mentioned before, I am still waiting for
> > SEV-SNP capable hardware to be delivered.
>
> Ingo, please do not rush this stuff in before Tom and I have tested it
> successfully with SEV* guests.
>
> Thanks!
I don't intend to rush it, but note that AMD's SEV-SNP testing is
lagging a *lot* at the moment: Ard asked for testing the -v2 series on
May 4:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250504095230.2932860-25-ardb+git@google.com
That request for testing was ignored AFAICS. It's May 13 and still
crickets.
We also had SEV-SNP boot bugs pending since August 2024, that nobody
but (eventually) AMD triggered. Ie. very few people outside of the
vendor are testing SEV-SNP AFAICS, and even vendor testing is sporadic
...
Please ask AMD internally to get SEV-SNP tested more reliably. Testing
this -v3 series would be a good start. Hint, hint. ;-)
Thanks!
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists