linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 02/11] mfd: Add max7360 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D9UZM817JKQM.2CPWNUC1H2AJW@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 13:14:14 +0200
From: "Mathieu Dubois-Briand" <mathieu.dubois-briand@...tlin.com>
To: "Lee Jones" <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>, "Rob Herring"
 <robh@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "Conor
 Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Kamel Bouhara" <kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com>,
 "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, "Bartosz Golaszewski"
 <brgl@...ev.pl>, "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
 Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>, "Michael Walle"
 <mwalle@...nel.org>, "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>, "Greg
 Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
 <rafael@...nel.org>, "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>,
 <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
 <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>, Grégory Clement
 <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, "Thomas Petazzoni"
 <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/11] mfd: Add max7360 support

On Tue May 13, 2025 at 11:31 AM CEST, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2025, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
>
>> On Mon May 12, 2025 at 11:21 AM CEST, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 11:14:36AM +0200, mathieu.dubois-briand@...tlin.com wrote:
>> >
>> >> +#define MAX7360_REG_GPIO_LAST		0x5F
>> >
>> >> +#define MAX7360_FIFO_EMPTY		0x3f
>> >> +#define MAX7360_FIFO_OVERFLOW		0x7f
>> >
>> > Please, be consistent in style of the values.
>> 
>> Is your point about the alignment of the values? Most of these are
>> aligned on column 41, including the ones above. I just have an exception
>> with MAX7360_PORT_CFG_*, as they are a bit too long. But as we are using
>> tabs here, indentation appears a bit broken in the patch.
>
> I believe the point was in reference to capitalisation.

Oh! Makes sense, I didn't saw that.

Thanks!

-- 
Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com