linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.14 000/197] 6.14.7-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYsGTqCxiXQOY3HEu4Z3CEwmyQoOb8DnpzVToWMW-Y8R5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 14:29:20 +0100
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, 
	broonie@...nel.org, clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>, 
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, 
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, 
	Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>, Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>, 
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.14 000/197] 6.14.7-rc1 review

On Tue, 13 May 2025 at 11:40, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 18:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.14.7 release.
> > There are 197 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 May 2025 17:19:58 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.14.7-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.14.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Regressions on mips defconfig tinyconfig and allnoconfig builds failed with
> clang-20 toolchain on stable-rc  6.14.7-rc1, 6.12.29-rc1 and 6.6.91-rc1.
> But, builds pass with gcc-13.
>
> * mips, build
>   - clang-20-allnoconfig
>   - clang-20-defconfig
>   - clang-20-tinyconfig
>   - korg-clang-20-lkftconfig-hardening
>   - korg-clang-20-lkftconfig-lto-full
>   - korg-clang-20-lkftconfig-lto-thing
>
> Regression Analysis:
>  - New regression? Yes
>  - Reproducibility? Yes
>
> Build regression: mips defconfig clang-20 instantiation error expected
> an immediate
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> ## Build error mips
> <instantiation>:7:11: error: expected an immediate
>  ori $26, r4k_wait_idle_size - 2
>           ^
> <instantiation>:10:13: error: expected an immediate
>  addiu $26, r4k_wait_exit - r4k_wait_insn + 2
>             ^
> <instantiation>:10:29: error: expected an immediate
>  addiu $26, r4k_wait_exit - r4k_wait_insn + 2
>                             ^
> <instantiation>:7:11: error: expected an immediate
>  ori $26, r4k_wait_idle_size - 2
>           ^
> <instantiation>:10:13: error: expected an immediate
>  addiu $26, r4k_wait_exit - r4k_wait_insn + 2
>             ^
> <instantiation>:10:29: error: expected an immediate
>  addiu $26, r4k_wait_exit - r4k_wait_insn + 2
>                             ^


The bisection found this as first bad commit,

    MIPS: Fix idle VS timer enqueue

    [ Upstream commit 56651128e2fbad80f632f388d6bf1f39c928267a ]

- Naresh Kamboju