lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCNLl-Kq0DPwm2Iq@ryzen>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 15:39:35 +0200
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>
Cc: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, jingoohan1@...il.com,
	manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] Standardize link status check to return
 bool

Hello Krzysztof,

On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:21:15PM +0900, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote:
> > ---
> > Changes for RESEND:
> > - add Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> 
> Resending a patch is not a place to add new tags.

While I realize that:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#don-t-get-discouraged-or-impatient

states:
"""
"RESEND" only applies to resubmission of a patch or patch series which
have not been modified in any way from the previous submission.
"""

I would assume that this only refers to the commit log and code,
and that picking up tags has to be an acceptable exception.

If I take myself as an example, I would not be happy if I spent time
reviewing a large patch series, but because the maintainers somehow
missed that series, so the patch author has to RESEND it (without
picking up tags), my Reviewed-by tags get lost.


Kind regards,
Niklas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ