[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOeEDyuFmFqacy1N8TtpuJRdv-3K2f1DzXNwR1MpyNn4Nrug7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 22:14:32 +0800
From: Cosmo Chou <chou.cosmo@...il.com>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: badhri@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cosmo.chou@...ntatw.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: typec: tcpm: Use configured PD revision for negotiation
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 04:50:49PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 04:39:09PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 09:08:34PM +0800, Cosmo Chou wrote:
> > > Initialize negotiated_rev and negotiated_rev_prime based on the port's
> > > configured PD revision (rev_major) rather than always defaulting to
> > > PD_MAX_REV. This ensures ports start PD communication using their
> > > appropriate revision level.
> > >
> > > This allows proper communication with devices that require specific
> > > PD revision levels, especially for the hardware designed for PD 1.0
> > > or 2.0 specifications.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Cosmo Chou <chou.cosmo@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > Change log:
> > >
> > > v2:
> > > - Add PD_CAP_REVXX macros and use switch-case for better readability.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > > index 8adf6f954633..48e9cfc2b49a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > > @@ -313,6 +313,10 @@ struct pd_data {
> > > unsigned int operating_snk_mw;
> > > };
> > >
> > > +#define PD_CAP_REV10 0x1
> > > +#define PD_CAP_REV20 0x2
> > > +#define PD_CAP_REV30 0x3
> > > +
> > > struct pd_revision_info {
> > > u8 rev_major;
> > > u8 rev_minor;
> > > @@ -4665,6 +4669,25 @@ static void tcpm_set_initial_svdm_version(struct tcpm_port *port)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void tcpm_set_initial_negotiated_rev(struct tcpm_port *port)
> > > +{
> > > + switch (port->pd_rev.rev_major) {
> > > + case PD_CAP_REV10:
> > > + port->negotiated_rev = PD_REV10;
> > > + break;
> > > + case PD_CAP_REV20:
> > > + port->negotiated_rev = PD_REV20;
> > > + break;
> > > + case PD_CAP_REV30:
> > > + port->negotiated_rev = PD_REV30;
> > > + break;
> > > + default:
> > > + port->negotiated_rev = PD_MAX_REV;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + port->negotiated_rev_prime = port->negotiated_rev;
> > > +}
> >
> > Do we need this? Couldn't you just add one to rev_major?
> >
> > port->negotiated_rev = port->pd_rev.rev_major + 1;
> > port->negotiated_rev_prime = port->pd_rev.rev_major + 1;
> >
> > Or am I missing something?
>
> Sorry, I mean minus one :-)
>
> port->negotiated_rev = port->pd_rev.rev_major - 1;
> port->negotiated_rev_prime = port->pd_rev.rev_major - 1;
>
> --
> heikki
It seems to be the PATCH v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250508174756.1300942-1-chou.cosmo@gmail.com/
if (port->pd_rev.rev_major > 0 && port->pd_rev.rev_major <= PD_MAX_REV + 1) {
port->negotiated_rev = port->pd_rev.rev_major - 1;
port->negotiated_rev_prime = port->pd_rev.rev_major - 1;
} else {
port->negotiated_rev = PD_MAX_REV;
port->negotiated_rev_prime = PD_MAX_REV;
}
--
Thanks
Cosmo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists