[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250514132720.6b16880c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 13:27:20 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri
Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Thomas
Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andrii
Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/13] unwind_user: x86: Deferred unwinding
infrastructure
On Tue, 13 May 2025 18:34:35 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> This has modifications in x86 and I would like it to go through the x86
> tree. Preferably it can go into this merge window so we can focus on getting
> perf and ftrace to work on top of this.
I think it may be best for me to remove the two x86 specific patches, and
rebuild the ftrace work on top of it. For testing, I'll just keep those two
patches in my tree locally, but then I can get this moving for this merge
window.
Next merge window, we can spend more time on getting the perf API working
properly.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists