linux-kernel - Re: lockup and kernel panic in linux-next-202505{09,12} when compiled with clang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <260e12b34c2043f54f399461274e983e43672093.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 19:49:10 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@....de>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, 
 "llvm@...ts.linux.dev"
	 <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lockup and kernel panic in linux-next-202505{09,12} when
 compiled with clang

On Wed, 2025-05-14 at 15:46 +0200, Bert Karwatzki wrote:
> 
> When compiled with clang the disassembly of the function is (from objdump -d)

Can you show with relocations ("objdump -dr" I think)? The jumps with
four 00 bytes don't really make sense if there aren't relocations for
them.

johannes