linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 00/30] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to /fs/resctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <565ea9e4-8fab-4a61-a642-177d5f98f523@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 11:03:47 -0700
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
 James Morse <james.morse@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
 Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
 D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
 carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
 bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
 baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
 Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
 dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com,
 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>,
 Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>, Koba Ko <kobak@...dia.com>,
 Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/30] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code
 to /fs/resctrl

Hi, Reinette,

On 5/13/25 14:19, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On 5/13/25 10:15 AM, James Morse wrote:
>> Changes since v10:
>>   * Changes the online domains check in patch 7 to walk control and monitor domains
>>     separately.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Patches 24-29 should be squashed together when merged, taking the commit message
>> of patch 25. It probably makes sense to drop the tags at that point as patch 25 is
>> generated by a script, and impossible to review. They are posted like this to allow
>> folk to re-generate patch 25, then review the differences on top. Not squashing them
>> together would expose a ftrace build warning during bisect. (but who does that!)
>>
>> The result  should look like this:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git mpam/move_to_fs/v11_final
> This branch does not exist.

This branch is existing now. I can clone, build, boot, and run some 
light tests on this branch. All work fine for me.

Thanks.

-Fenghua