[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250514051747.GA24503@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 07:17:47 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, xni@...hat.com, colyli@...nel.org,
agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org, mpatocka@...hat.com,
song@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, johnny.chenyi@...wei.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC md-6.16 v3 15/19] md/md-llbitmap: implement APIs to
dirty bits and clear bits
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 05:32:13PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> I was thinking about record a stack dev depth in mddev to handle the
> weird case inside raid. Is there other stack device have the same
> problem? AFAIK, some dm targets like dm-crypt are using workqueue
> to handle all IO.
I guess anything that might have to read in metadata to serve a
data I/O. bcache, dm-snapshot and dm-thinkp would be candidates for
that, but I haven't checked the implementation.
> I'm still interested because this can improve first write latency.
>
>>
>> So instead just write a comment documenting why you switch to a
>> different stack using the workqueue.
>
> Ok, I'll add comment if we keep using the workqueue.
Maybe do that for getting the new bitmap code in ASAP and then
revisit the above separately?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists