[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCT6I5dhx5-xluOo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 13:16:35 -0700
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Tsai Sung-Fu <danielsftsai@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] genirq: Retain disable depth across irq
shutdown/startup
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 09:35:49AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, May 13 2025 at 15:42, Brian Norris wrote:
> > @@ -272,7 +272,9 @@ int irq_startup(struct irq_desc *desc, bool resend, bool force)
> > const struct cpumask *aff = irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d);
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > - desc->depth = 0;
> > + desc->depth--;
> > + if (desc->depth)
> > + return 0;
>
> This breaks a
>
> request_irq()
> disable_irq()
> free_irq()
> request_irq()
>
> sequence.
Ah, thanks for the callout. I factored that into another unit test in
v2.
> So the only case where the disable depth needs to be preserved is for
> managed interrupts in the hotunplug -> shutdown -> hotplug -> startup
> scenario. Making that explicit avoids chasing all other places and
> sprinkle desc->depth = 1 into them. Something like the uncompiled below
> should do the trick.
Seems reasonable, and it works for me. I've incorporated that in v2,
although I'm not sure how the attribution should work there.
Thanks,
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists