[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJnrk1ZH3hwgtgOq7a=J-vxop5fCm5K_ZEek0W3kX9N1xf4HAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 16:03:42 -0700
From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, chenlinxuan@...ontech.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] fuse: Expose more information of fuse backing
files to userspace
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 1:50 AM Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 May 2025 at 20:52, Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > For getting from conn to fuse server pid, what about adding the server
> > pid to fuse's sysfs info? This use case has come up a few times in
> > production where we've encountered a stuck server and have wanted to
> > identify its pid. I have a patch on a branch I need to clean up and
> > send out for this, but it adds a new "info" file to
> > /sys/fs/fuse/connections/*/ where libfuse can write any identifying
> > info to that file like the server pid or name. If the connection gets
> > migrated to another process then libfuse is responsible for modifying
> > that to reflect the correct info.
>
> Fine, but then why not just write something in /var/run/fuse?
Oh cool, I didn't know there's a /var/run directory. But I guess one
advantage of doing it in sysfs is that it'll work for unprivileged
servers whereas I think with /var/run/, there needs to be elevated
permissions to write to anything in that directory path.
Thanks,
Joanne
>
> Thanks,
> Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists