[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCUmGC45Pg6qC6FR@google.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 16:24:08 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Liang@...gle.com,
Kan <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@...el.com>, Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>, Zide Chen <zide.chen@...el.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@...gle.com>, Shukla Manali <Manali.Shukla@....com>,
Nikunj Dadhania <nikunj.dadhania@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/38] perf: core/x86: Register a new vector for KVM
GUEST PMI
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
> index ad5c68f0509d..b0cb3220e1bb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h
> @@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(IRQ_WORK_VECTOR, sysvec_irq_work);
> DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_VECTOR, sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi);
> DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR, sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi);
> DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR, sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi);
> +DECLARE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR, sysvec_kvm_guest_pmi_handler);
I would prefer to keep KVM out of the name, and as mentioned in the previous patch,
route this through perf.
> #else
> # define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi NULL
> # define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi NULL
Y'all forgot to wire up the FRED handling. I.e. the mediated PMI IRQs would get
treated as spurious when running with FRED.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> index 47051871b436..250cdab11306 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> @@ -77,7 +77,10 @@
> */
> #define IRQ_WORK_VECTOR 0xf6
>
> -/* 0xf5 - unused, was UV_BAU_MESSAGE */
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
> +#define KVM_GUEST_PMI_VECTOR 0xf5
> +#endif
Conditionally defining the vector sounds good on paper, but its problematic, e.g.
for connecting the handler to FRED's array, and doesn't really add much value.
> #define DEFERRED_ERROR_VECTOR 0xf4
>
> /* Vector on which hypervisor callbacks will be delivered */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
> index f445bec516a0..0bec4c7e2308 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/idt.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ static const __initconst struct idt_data apic_idts[] = {
> INTG(POSTED_INTR_VECTOR, asm_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi),
> INTG(POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR, asm_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi),
> INTG(POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR, asm_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi),
Powered by blists - more mailing lists