[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250514064758.4156497-3-luogengkun@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 06:47:58 +0000
From: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun@...weicloud.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com,
acme@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
irogers@...gle.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
yeoreum.yun@....com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH Fix perf cgroup problem 2/2] perf/core: Fix WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuctx->ctx.nr_cgroups == 0) in perf_cgroup_switch
There may be concurrency between perf_cgroup_switch and
perf_cgroup_event_disable. Consider the following scenario: after a new
perf cgroup event is created on CPU0, the new event might not trigger
reprogramm, leaving ctx->is_active as 0. In this case, when CPU1 disables
the perf event, it executes __perf_remove_from_context->list_del_event->
perf_cgroup_event_disable on CPU1, resulting in a race with
perf_cgroup_switch running on CPU0.
To fix this problem, expand the lock-holding critical section in
perf_cgroup_switch.
Fixes: db4a835601b7 ("perf/core: Set cgroup in CPU contexts for new cgroup events")
Signed-off-by: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun@...weicloud.com>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index ecb4d852a006..fae1f68cbca5 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -931,20 +931,20 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task)
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(&perf_cpu_context);
struct perf_cgroup *cgrp;
+ cgrp = perf_cgroup_from_task(task, NULL);
+ perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
/*
* cpuctx->cgrp is set when the first cgroup event enabled,
* and is cleared when the last cgroup event disabled.
*/
if (READ_ONCE(cpuctx->cgrp) == NULL)
- return;
+ goto unlock;
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuctx->ctx.nr_cgroups == 0);
- cgrp = perf_cgroup_from_task(task, NULL);
if (READ_ONCE(cpuctx->cgrp) == cgrp)
- return;
+ goto unlock;
- perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
perf_ctx_disable(&cpuctx->ctx, true);
ctx_sched_out(&cpuctx->ctx, NULL, EVENT_ALL|EVENT_CGROUP);
@@ -962,6 +962,7 @@ static void perf_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *task)
ctx_sched_in(&cpuctx->ctx, NULL, EVENT_ALL|EVENT_CGROUP);
perf_ctx_enable(&cpuctx->ctx, true);
+unlock:
perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists