[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b2abcfe-0d95-439f-af09-f86f1a5eef0b@ghiti.fr>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 09:35:05 +0200
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] riscv: kprobes: Move branch_rs2_idx to insn.h
On 14/05/2025 09:32, Nam Cao wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 09:24:55AM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>>> +#define RV_EXTRACT_RS2_REG(x) \
>>> + ({typeof(x) x_ = (x); \
>>> + (RV_X(x_, RVG_RS2_OPOFF, RVG_RS2_MASK)); })
>> RV_X() definition was inconsistent across multiple files, so I harmonized
>> RV_X() it in this patch https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20250508125202.108613-3-alexghiti@rivosinc.com/
>>
>> So here you use the "old" version, would you mind rebasing on top this
>> patchset and use RV_X_mask() instead?
> I will do that. Thanks for the info.
Thanks, just give me the day to review the whole patchset before you
send a new version.
Thanks again,
Alex
>
> Nam
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists