lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b2abcfe-0d95-439f-af09-f86f1a5eef0b@ghiti.fr>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 09:35:05 +0200
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] riscv: kprobes: Move branch_rs2_idx to insn.h

On 14/05/2025 09:32, Nam Cao wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 09:24:55AM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>>> +#define RV_EXTRACT_RS2_REG(x) \
>>> +	({typeof(x) x_ = (x); \
>>> +	(RV_X(x_, RVG_RS2_OPOFF, RVG_RS2_MASK)); })
>> RV_X() definition was inconsistent across multiple files, so I harmonized
>> RV_X() it in this patch https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20250508125202.108613-3-alexghiti@rivosinc.com/
>>
>> So here you use the "old" version, would you mind rebasing on top this
>> patchset and use RV_X_mask() instead?
> I will do that. Thanks for the info.


Thanks, just give me the day to review the whole patchset before you 
send a new version.

Thanks again,

Alex


>
> Nam
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ