lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250514074847.GX2936510@google.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 08:48:47 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the gpio-brgl tree

On Wed, 14 May 2025, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The following commits are also in the mfd tree as different commits
> (but the same patches):
> 
>   81fec13be953 ("dt-bindings: mfd: Add max77759 binding")
>   ee71546b8120 ("dt-bindings: nvmem: Add max77759 binding")
>   190b565788ed ("dt-bindings: gpio: Add max77759 binding")
> 
> These are commits
> 
>   f63a2ff5372e ("dt-bindings: mfd: add max77759 binding")
>   3f29432ca3d3 ("dt-bindings: nvmem: add max77759 binding")
>   8ba821d3c314 ("dt-bindings: gpio: add max77759 binding")
> 
> in the mfd tree.

This is probably my fault.  It should now be fixed.

Let's check again tomorrow.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ