linux-kernel - 答复: [RFC PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add mm ksm section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202505140950573489NhOV97K3BT0-xew40vNy@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 09:50:57 +0800 (CST)
From: <xu.xin16@....com.cn>
To: <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: <david@...hat.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yang.yang29@....com.cn>,
        <jiang.xuexin@....com.cn>, <Liu.Jianjun3@....com.cn>
Subject: 答复: [RFC PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add mm ksm section

> > I guess my point is, as a submitter you expect that people that are listed
> > under R: that you are supposed to CC would actually ... review? :D
> >
> 
> Yeah of course, kinda makes sense right?
>
> > In that case, I would prefer to have actual reviewers there. If there are
> > none, then there should be none listed.
> >
> > Of course, If Xu and Chengming do *want* to actively review KSM code
> > changes, I would be more than happy to list them.
> 
> Sure, so I think best thing is to ask:
> 
> Xu, Chengming - do you WANT to be reviewers here? :) if not, happy to drop.


Sure,  I am more than willing to take on the role of reviewer for the KSM module.
I am pleasured to dedicating my time to reviewing new patches about KSM on the
mailing list. Thank you for the invitation.

Cheers, Xu

>
> I could add myself as a reviewer as a backup option in case you need review
> also guys, though KSM is really not my area but I can approach from first
> principles at least.
>
> Cheers, Lorenzo