linux-kernel - Re: 答复: [RFC PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add mm ksm section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a46874fc-d3bb-4cc7-871d-fd9791eb2e52@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 10:14:10 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: xu.xin16@....com.cn, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yang.yang29@....com.cn,
 jiang.xuexin@....com.cn, Liu.Jianjun3@....com.cn
Subject: Re: 答复: [RFC PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add mm ksm section

On 14.05.25 03:50, xu.xin16@....com.cn wrote:
>>> I guess my point is, as a submitter you expect that people that are listed
>>> under R: that you are supposed to CC would actually ... review? :D
>>>
>>
>> Yeah of course, kinda makes sense right?
>>
>>> In that case, I would prefer to have actual reviewers there. If there are
>>> none, then there should be none listed.
>>>
>>> Of course, If Xu and Chengming do *want* to actively review KSM code
>>> changes, I would be more than happy to list them.
>>
>> Sure, so I think best thing is to ask:
>>
>> Xu, Chengming - do you WANT to be reviewers here? :) if not, happy to drop.
> 
> 
> Sure,  I am more than willing to take on the role of reviewer for the KSM module.
> I am pleasured to dedicating my time to reviewing new patches about KSM on the
> mailing list. Thank you for the invitation.

Thanks to both of you, happy to hear that!

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb