linux-kernel - Re: [RFT PATCH v3 00/21] x86: strict separation of startup code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250514081706.GBaCRRguKiuyx3gcd4@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 10:17:06 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
	Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@...gle.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v3 00/21] x86: strict separation of startup code

On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 08:20:31AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> I've highlighted all the robustness problems and design flaws of the 
> existing SEV* startup code...

You can highlight all you want - nothing warrants rushing those in without
testing. Period. No matter how much you try to spin it and flip it.

> Your failure to follow and understand this series is not an excuse for 
> the flippant and condescending tone you are using in your replies ...

You must be confusing me with someone else to constantly give me that
condescending schoolteacher tone.

If you do shit like you do, you will get called on it until you behave
according to the rules we all have agreed upon.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette