lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250514084024.29148-1-lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 09:40:24 +0100
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: remove WARN_ON_ONCE() in file_has_valid_mmap_hooks()

Having encountered a trinity report in linux-next (Linked in the 'Closes'
tag) it appears that there are legitimate situations where a file-backed
mapping can be acquired but no file->f_op->mmap or file->f_op->mmap_prepare
is set, at which point do_mmap() should simply error out with -ENODEV.

Since previously we did not warn in this scenario and it appears we rely
upon this, restore this situation, while retaining a WARN_ON_ONCE() for the
case where both are set, which is absolutely incorrect and must be
addressed and thus always requires a warning.

If further work is required to chase down precisely what is causing this,
then we can later restore this, but it makes no sense to hold up this
series to do so, as this is existing and apparently expected behaviour.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202505141434.96ce5e5d-lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
---

Andrew -

Since this series is in mm-stable we should take this fix there asap (and
certainly get it to -next to fix any further error reports). I didn't know
whether it was best for it to be a fix-patch or not, so have sent
separately so you can best determine what to do with it :)

Thanks, Lorenzo

 include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index e2721a1ff13d..09c8495dacdb 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2248,7 +2248,7 @@ static inline bool file_has_valid_mmap_hooks(struct file *file)
 	/* Hooks are mutually exclusive. */
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(has_mmap && has_mmap_prepare))
 		return false;
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!has_mmap && !has_mmap_prepare))
+	if (!has_mmap && !has_mmap_prepare)
 		return false;

 	return true;
--
2.49.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ