[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250514110927.cwwZr3Sw@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 13:09:27 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cryptd: Use nested-BH locking for cryptd_cpu_queue
On 2025-05-14 13:07:50 [+0200], To linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org wrote:
> cryptd_queue::cryptd_cpu_queue is a per-CPU variable and relies on
> disabled BH for its locking. Without per-CPU locking in
> local_bh_disable() on PREEMPT_RT this data structure requires explicit
> locking.
>
> Add a local_lock_t to the struct cryptd_cpu_queue and use
> local_lock_nested_bh() for locking. This change adds only lockdep
> coverage and does not alter the functional behaviour for !PREEMPT_RT.
>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
This is meant as an example for #1 and should not be applied.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists