linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] memcg: memcg_rstat_updated re-entrant safe against irqs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bdxkbztn63ey4pndh3hfzope2bnysw6yyqqzfu2sdjue2glujy@5eqev4hldzxq>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 08:22:04 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, 
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, 
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, 
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, 
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Meta kernel team <kernel-team@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] memcg: memcg_rstat_updated re-entrant safe
 against irqs

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 03:53:17PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 07:31:09AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 5:47 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
> > <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Shakeel - This breaks the build in mm-new for me:
> > >
> > >   CC      mm/pt_reclaim.o
> > > In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/rmwcc.h:5,
> > >                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:18,
> > >                  from ./include/linux/bitops.h:68,
> > >                  from ./include/linux/radix-tree.h:11,
> > >                  from ./include/linux/idr.h:15,
> > >                  from ./include/linux/cgroup-defs.h:13,
> > >                  from mm/memcontrol.c:28:
> > > mm/memcontrol.c: In function ‘mem_cgroup_alloc’:
> > > ./arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:39:45: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before ‘__seg_gs’
> > >    39 | #define __percpu_seg_override   CONCATENATE(__seg_, __percpu_seg)
> > >       |                                             ^~~~~~
> > > ./include/linux/args.h:25:24: note: in definition of macro ‘__CONCAT’
> > >    25 | #define __CONCAT(a, b) a ## b
> > >       |                        ^
> > > ./arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:39:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘CONCATENATE’
> > >    39 | #define __percpu_seg_override   CONCATENATE(__seg_, __percpu_seg)
> > >       |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > > ./arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:93:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘__percpu_seg_override’
> > >    93 | # define __percpu_qual          __percpu_seg_override
> > >       |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:60:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘__percpu_qual’
> > >    60 | # define __percpu       __percpu_qual BTF_TYPE_TAG(percpu)
> > >       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > mm/memcontrol.c:3700:45: note: in expansion of macro ‘__percpu’
> > >  3700 |         struct memcg_vmstats_percpu *statc, __percpu *pstatc_pcpu;
> > >       |                                             ^~~~~~~~
> > > mm/memcontrol.c:3731:25: error: ‘pstatc_pcpu’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘kstat_cpu’?
> > >  3731 |                         pstatc_pcpu = parent->vmstats_percpu;
> > >       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > >       |                         kstat_cpu
> > > mm/memcontrol.c:3731:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > >
> > > The __percpu macro seems to be a bit screwy with comma-delimited decls, as it
> > > seems that putting this on its own line fixes this problem:
> > >
> >
> > Which compiler (and version) is this? Thanks for the fix.
> 
> gcc 15, but apparently 13, 14 also fail. It seems independent of config.

Thanks, somehow it works with gcc 11.5.0.