linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] Introduce CET supervisor state support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aCYLMY00dKbiIfsB@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 17:41:37 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, dave.hansen@...el.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
	pbonzini@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, weijiang.yang@...el.com,
	john.allen@....com, bp@...en8.de, chang.seok.bae@...el.com,
	xin3.li@...el.com, Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@...cle.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
	Mitchell Levy <levymitchell0@...il.com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
	Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
	Stanislav Spassov <stanspas@...zon.de>,
	Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>,
	Vignesh Balasubramanian <vigbalas@....com>,
	Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] Introduce CET supervisor state support


* Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com> wrote:

> Dear maintainers and reviewers,
> 
> I kindly request your consideration for merging this series. Most of 
> patches have received Reviewed-by/Acked-by tags.

I don't see anything objectionable in this series.

The upcoming v6.16 merge window is already quite crowded in terms of 
FPU changes, so I think at this point we are looking at a v6.17 merge, 
done shortly after v6.16-rc1 if everything goes well. Dave, what do you 
think?

Thanks,

	Ingo