linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] mfd: bcm590xx: Add support for multiple device types + BCM59054 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6fd5ad47-8f01-43a4-aa92-e067c25ff195@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 17:46:43 +0200
From: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Ray Jui
 <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
 Broadcom internal kernel review list
 <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
 Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] mfd: bcm590xx: Add support for multiple device
 types + BCM59054 compatible

On 5/15/25 15:13, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2025, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 01:28:15PM +0200, Artur Weber wrote:
>>> On 5/15/25 11:33, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:20:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>>
>>>>> I can go with 2 in this case.  Applying in dribs-and-drabs as Acks come
>>>>> in would be sub-optimal and would likely end up in a mess.
>>
>>>> Well, then just going a head and applying them on a branch with a tag
>>>> seems easier than delaying then.
>>
>>> I can split the patchset into two parts (one for MFD, one for regulator)
>>> if it helps.
>>
>> There's still a dependency on the MFD bits whatever happens.
> 
> Right.  That won't help since you need to describe the deps.  Submitting
> them as a set was the correct thing to do.
> 

OK then. I submitted a new version, v9, with the style nitpick
addressed:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250515-bcm59054-v9-0-14ba0ea2ea5b@gmail.com/

Best regards
Artur