[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCYTaveeziFiF3kw@x1>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:16:42 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf pmu intel: Adjust cpumaks for sub-NUMA clusters
on graniterapids
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 01:15:26PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 09:38:18PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On graniterapids the cache home agent (CHA) and memory controller
> > (IMC) PMUs all have their cpumask set to per-socket information. In
> > order for per NUMA node aggregation to work correctly the PMUs cpumask
> > needs to be set to CPUs for the relevant sub-NUMA grouping.
>
> I'm blindly applying it as I can't test these changes, and I think this
> is bad.
In the end the only review/action I could do was to turn:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf pmu intel: Adjust cpumaks for sub-NUMA clusters
Into:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf pmu intel: Adjust cpumasks for sub-NUMA clusters
:-(
Besides the build tests, etc.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists