[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <l7xs6ea7takb5yvyvobxoce3mudbgen5d7s47onksm4ujpdkib@tvstwbdpvm4o>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 12:37:04 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+3f0b3970f154dfc95e6e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, eric.snowberg@...cle.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, paul@...l-moore.com, roberto.sassu@...wei.com, serge@...lyn.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, zohar@...ux.ibm.com, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [lsm?] [integrity?] KMSAN: uninit-value in
ima_add_template_entry (3)
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 04:30:09PM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 10:18 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 04:06:02PM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2025-05-14 at 07:54 -0700, syzbot wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > >
> > > + Kent, bcachefs mailing list
> > >
> > > I have the feeling that this was recently fixed in one of the latest
> > > pull requests in bcachefs. I don't see it occurring anymore, and there
> > > are more commits after the one reported by syzbot.
> >
> > I have no idea how any of the ima stuff works or even what it does, I'm
> > not even sure where I'd start...
>
> Basically, I got a clue that bcachefs would be the cause from the
> bottom of the report:
>
> page_cache_sync_ra+0x108a/0x13e0 mm/readahead.c:621
> filemap_get_pages+0xfb3/0x3a70 mm/filemap.c:2591
> filemap_read+0x5c6/0x2190 mm/filemap.c:2702
> bch2_read_iter+0x559/0x21c0 fs/bcachefs/fs-io-direct.c:221
> __kernel_read+0x750/0xda0 fs/read_write.c:528
> integrity_kernel_read+0x77/0x90 security/integrity/iint.c:28
>
> This means that IMA is reading a file and calculating a digest over it:
>
> ima_calc_file_hash_tfm security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c:498 [inline]
> ima_calc_file_shash security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c:511 [inline]
> ima_calc_file_hash+0x240a/0x3fd0 security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c:568
> ima_collect_measurement+0x45d/0xe60 security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c:293
> process_measurement+0x2d1a/0x40e0 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:385
> ima_file_check+0x8e/0xd0 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:613
>
> syzbot is complaining that the data the digest was calculated from was
> not initialized (e.g. zeroed).
>
> There is a reproducer, we would be probably able to do a bisection and
> find the commit that caused it (and maybe the one that fixed it).
Ok, that would be fixed by the - multiple - KMSAN fixes, most of those
were spurious but code was lacking annotations. Probably this one:
9c3a2c9b471a bcachefs: Disable asm memcpys when kmsan enabled
Powered by blists - more mailing lists