lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ldqxikaz.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 00:24:52 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Tsai Sung-Fu
 <danielsftsai@...gle.com>, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts

On Thu, May 15 2025 at 10:21, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:01:18PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250514201353.3481400-3-briannorris%40chromium.org
>> patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts
>
> First of all, thanks for the help, and for applying patch 1. I see that:
> 1) this bot noticed a trivial problem with patch 2; and
> 2) I received notification that patch 2 was applied to tip/irq/core, but
> 3) I can't find it there any more.
>
> I'm not sure if #3 is because you dropped it (e.g., due to #1's report)
> or some other reason, so I'm not sure what to do next. Possibilities:

#3 because I dropped it.

> (a) send the trivial fix separately, as a fixup (against what tree?)
> (b) resend an improved patch 2 on its own, against tip/irq/core
> (c) just drop it, because you have deeper reasons to not want these
>     tests.

#b please

Thanks,

        tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ