[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o6vutrbw.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 04:45:23 +0000
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
(Renesas)shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
(Renesas)goda <yusuke.goda.sx@...esas.com>,
(Renesas)Kurokawa <harunobu.kurokawa.dn@...esas.com>,
(Renesas)Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@...esas.com>,
kazuya.mizuguchi.ks@...esas.com, takamitsu.honda.pv@...esas.com
Subject: Question about UIO vs DT
Hi Greg / UIO / DT
I would like to ask about UIO vs DT.
If my understanding was correct, current UIO can use 1 IRQ / 1 reg per 1 UIO,
but some device needs multi-IRQ/reg. In such case, we need to use
multi-UIO. But it is not good much to DT rule. For example in case of
the device which needs "2 regs 3 irqs". it will be
(A) [1 reg, 1 IRQ] UIO
(B) [1 reg, 1 IRQ] UIO
(C) [0 reg, 1 IRQ] UIO
and (C) will be DT error. Is this known issue ? Do we have better solution ?
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists