linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Add `devm_dma_request_chan()` to simplify probe path in atmel-quadspi.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aCW1geupMxr8Ft_k@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 11:36:01 +0200
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Csókás Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Add `devm_dma_request_chan()` to simplify probe
 path in atmel-quadspi.c

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 11:26:57AM +0200, Csókás Bence wrote:
> On 2025. 05. 15. 11:22, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Wouldn't it be simpler for me to just apply both
> > patches at this point if there's no conflicts with the DMA tree?  We're
> > at -rc6 now...

> That also works for me. I should send 1/2 to you as well, correct?

I think at this point with the merge window likely to open on Sunday
it's probably easiest to just resend the SPI patch after the merge
window, it'll likely take more time/effort to work out what to do than
it will for the reset changes to land in Linus' tree.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)