[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <psvtoce37eljiye6nuzffpyaz65c33ipvfos7lyyitw5ixthkz@aclnplhcmlme>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:47:40 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] fs/read_write: make default_llseek() killable
On Tue 13-05-25 17:03:27, Max Kellermann wrote:
> Allows killing processes that are waiting for the inode lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> v2: split into separate patches
>
> TODO: review whether all callers can handle EINTR; see
I did a quick audit and everything seems OK AFAICT.
Honza
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250512-unrat-kapital-2122d3777c5d@brauner/
> and
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/hzrj5b7x3rvtxt4qgjxdihhi5vjoc5gw3i35pbyopa7ccucizo@q5c42kjlkly3/
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
> ---
> fs/read_write.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> index bb0ed26a0b3a..0ef70e128c4a 100644
> --- a/fs/read_write.c
> +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> @@ -332,7 +332,9 @@ loff_t default_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
> struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> loff_t retval;
>
> - inode_lock(inode);
> + retval = inode_lock_killable(inode);
> + if (retval)
> + return retval;
> switch (whence) {
> case SEEK_END:
> offset += i_size_read(inode);
> --
> 2.47.2
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists