linux-kernel - Re: [RFC next v2 0/5] ucount: add rlimit cache for ucount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d8e88314-c31f-4132-a4b0-aad7eeb0f082@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 20:04:53 +0800
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
 legion@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, tglx@...utronix.de,
 frederic@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, oleg@...hat.com,
 joel.granados@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
 lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, avagin@...gle.com, mengensun@...cent.com,
 linux@...ssschuh.net, jlayton@...nel.org, ruanjinjie@...wei.com,
 kees@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lujialin4@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC next v2 0/5] ucount: add rlimit cache for ucount



On 2025/5/15 18:29, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Woah, I don't think we want to go down that route. That sounds so overly
> complex. We should only do that if we absolutely have to. If we can get
> away with the percpu counter and some optimizations we might be better
> off in the long run.

Thank you for your reply, I will send the next version with percpu_counter.

Thanks,
Ridong