[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f727a009-a896-4eb5-8b1c-03417d48e545@heusel.eu>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 14:40:21 +0200
From: Christian Heusel <christian@...sel.eu>
To: Luna Jernberg <droidbittin@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com,
broonie@...nel.org, Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>, Ray Wu <ray.wu@....com>, Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.14 000/197] 6.14.7-rc1 review
On 25/05/15 02:34PM, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Same problem in rc2 just tested
Yes the fix is still on the way to mainline (see the mail from Mario
pointing to the patches posted to amd-gfx), but given that it's just
some log entries that stop again and nothing serious it should not be of
much issue.
Cheers,
Chris
> Den tis 13 maj 2025 kl 07:26 skrev Christian Heusel <christian@...sel.eu>:
> >
> > On 25/05/12 07:37PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.14.7 release.
> > > There are 197 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 May 2025 17:19:58 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I have noticed that the following commit produces a whole bunch of lines
> > in my journal, which looks like an error for me:
> >
> > > Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@....com>
> > > drm/amd/display: Fix wrong handling for AUX_DEFER case
> >
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX reply command not ACK: 0x01.
> > amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: [drm] amdgpu: AUX partially written
> >
> > this does not seem to be serious, i.e. the system otherwise works as
> > intended but it's still noteworthy. Is there a dependency commit missing
> > maybe? From the code it looks like it was meant to be this way 🤔
> >
> > You can find a full journal here, with the logspammed parts in
> > highlight:
> > https://gist.github.com/christian-heusel/e8418bbdca097871489a31d79ed166d6#file-dmesg-log-L854-L981
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists