lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba1e1ae6824f47bcb49387ae4f2c70dfd45209bc.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 14:56:27 +0200
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra
	 <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Yoshinori Sato
	 <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, 
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] bugs/sh: Concatenate 'cond_str' with '__FILE__'
 in __WARN_FLAGS(), to extend WARN_ON/BUG_ON output

Hi Ingo,

On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 14:46 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Extend WARN_ON and BUG_ON style output from:
> 
>   WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/core.c:8511 sched_init+0x20/0x410
> 
> to:
> 
>   WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at [idx < 0 && ptr] kernel/sched/core.c:8511 sched_init+0x20/0x410
> 
> Note that the output will be further reorganized later in this series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
> Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/sh/include/asm/bug.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/bug.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/bug.h
> index 834c621ab249..891276687355 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/bug.h
> +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/bug.h
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ do {							\
>  		 _EMIT_BUG_ENTRY			\
>  		 :					\
>  		 : "n" (TRAPA_BUG_OPCODE),		\
> -		   "i" (__FILE__),			\
> +		   "i" (WARN_CONDITION_STR(cond_str) __FILE__),	\
>  		   "i" (__LINE__),			\
>  		   "i" (BUGFLAG_WARNING|(flags)),	\
>  		   "i" (sizeof(struct bug_entry)));	\

Looks good to me, however I'm not happy with the summary line.

It's too long and the prefix "bugs/sh:" is very confusing. I usually just
use "sh:" to mark anything that affects arch/sh.

Can I pick this patch for my sh-linux tree?

Thanks,
Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ