linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] x86/64/mm: Make 5-level paging support unconditional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aCdd60hwRbx207bU@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 17:46:51 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
	Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
	Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] x86/64/mm: Make 5-level paging support
 unconditional


* Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:

> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 12:15:33PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > @@ -173,10 +173,10 @@ For example, when an old kernel is running on new hardware.
> >  The kernel disabled support for it at compile-time
> >  --------------------------------------------------
> >  
> > -For example, if 5-level-paging is not enabled when building (i.e.,
> > -CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL is not selected) the flag "la57" will not show up [#f1]_.
> > +For example, if Linear Address Masking (LAM) is not enabled when building (i.e.,
> > +CONFIG_ADDRESS_MASKING is not selected) the flag "lam" will not show up.
> >  Even though the feature will still be detected via CPUID, the kernel disables
> > -it by clearing via setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_LA57).
> > +it by clearing via setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_LAM).
> 
> LOL, good one.
> 
> The rest looks nice and good to me. And FWIW, it boots fine on my Zen5 with
> 5lvl enabled.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>

What's your preference on timing? v6.17 or v6.16?

Thanks,

	Ingo