[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW4MAcVpXmZVQauoaYe0o3tDvvZfgmCrYFFyFojYpNiWWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 09:53:36 -0700
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, indu.bhagat@...cle.com, puranjay@...nel.org,
wnliu@...gle.com, irogers@...gle.com, joe.lawrence@...hat.com,
jpoimboe@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
rostedt@...dmis.org, will@...nel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: livepatch: Enable livepatch without sframe
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 8:17 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
>
[...]
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/20250127213310.2496133-1-wnliu@google.com/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/20250129232936.1795412-1-song@kernel.org/
> > [3] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32589
> > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20241017092538.1859841-1-mark.rutland@arm.com/
> >
> > Changes v2 => v3:
> > 1. Remove a redundant check for -ENOENT. (Josh Poimboeuf)
> > 2. Add Tested-by and Acked-by on v1. (I forgot to add them in v2.)
>
> The approach and both patches look reasonable:
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>
> Is anyone, Arm people, Mark, against pushing this into linux-next,
> please?
Ping.
ARM folks, please share your thoughts on this work. To fully support
livepatching of kernel modules, we also need [1]. We hope we can
land this in the 6.16 kernel.
Thanks,
Song
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20250412010940.1686376-1-dylanbhatch@google.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists