lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250516170316.GD1241@sol>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 10:03:16 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Jain@...menos.rohan.me.apana.org.au,
	Ayush <Ayush.Jain3@....com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: lib/sha256 - Disable SIMD

On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 07:48:52PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 07:34:06PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > 
> > So what's happened is that previously if you call sha256_update
> > from lib/crypto it would only use the generic C code to perform
> > the operation.
> > 
> > This has now been changed to automatically use SIMD instructions
> > which obviously blew up in your case.
> 
> In the interim you can go back to the old ways and disable SIMD
> for lib/crypto sha256 with this patch:
> 
> ---8<---
> Disable SIMD usage in lib/crypto sha256 as it is causing crashes.
> 
> Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Fixes: 950e5c84118c ("crypto: sha256 - support arch-optimized lib and expose through shash")
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>

That's silly.  We should just fix x86's irq_fpu_usable() to return false before
the CPU is properly initialized.  It already checks a per-cpu bool, so it
shouldn't be too hard to fit that in.

Using the generic SHA-256 code explicitly is also an option, but ideally the
regular functions would just work.

- Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ