[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e21b693-e03e-4a76-aada-0c48aeae6eec@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 23:42:21 +0500
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To: Jeff Hugo <jeff.hugo@....qualcomm.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>, Youssef Samir
<quic_yabdulra@...cinc.com>, Matthew Leung <quic_mattleun@...cinc.com>,
Yan Zhen <yanzhen@...o.com>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
Cc: usama.anjum@...labora.com, kernel@...labora.com,
sebastian.reichel@...labora.com, Jeff Johnson
<jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>, Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@...cinc.com>,
mhi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
ath11k@...ts.infradead.org, ath12k@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] bus: mhi: host: don't free bhie tables during
suspend/hibernation
On 5/16/25 7:59 PM, Jeff Hugo wrote:
> On 5/14/2025 2:14 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> Fix dma_direct_alloc() failure at resume time during bhie_table
>> allocation because of memory pressure. There is a report where at
>> resume time, the memory from the dma doesn't get allocated and MHI
>> fails to re-initialize.
>>
>> To fix it, don't free the memory at power down during suspend /
>> hibernation. Instead, use the same allocated memory again after every
>> resume / hibernation. This patch has been tested with resume and
>> hibernation both.
>>
>> There are two allocations of bhie; rddm and fbc. Optimize both of those
>
> There are 3, but you touch 2. I just commented on this in v4. Only
> touching two is fine (the device for the 3rd one doesn't need this), but
> the documentation must be accurate.
Yeah, for 3rd one in mhi_load_image_bhie(), this optimization isn't
needed. Let me rephrase and resent v6.
>
>> allocations. The rddm is of constant size for a given hardware. While
>> the fbc_image size depends on the firmware. If the firmware changes,
>> we'll free and allocate new memory for it. This patch is moticated from
>
> moticated? Motivated maybe?
I'm using checkpatch --strict --codespell and hopping that it'll catch
typos. But it misses some of them. Do you use any such tool?
>
>> the ath12k [1] and ath11k [2] patches. They don't free the memory and
>> reuse the same memory if new size is same. The firmware caching hasn't
>> been implemented for the drivers other than the nouveau. (The changing
>> of firmware isn't tested/supported for wireless drivers. But let's
>> follow the example patches here.)
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240419034034.2842-1-
>> quic_bqiang@...cinc.com/
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220506141448.10340-1-
>> quic_akolli@...cinc.com/
>>
>> Tested-on: WCN6855 WLAN.HSP.1.1-03926.13-
>> QCAHSPSWPL_V2_SILICONZ_CE-2.52297.6
>> Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00284-
>> QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3
>>
>> Acked-by: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>
>> Tested-by: Baochen Qiang <quic_bqiang@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Don't free bhie tables during suspend/hibernation only
>> - Handle fbc_image changed size correctly
>> - Remove fbc_image getting set to NULL in *free_bhie_table()
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> - Remove the new mhi_partial_unprepare_after_power_down() and instead
>> update mhi_power_down_keep_dev() to use
>> mhi_power_down_unprepare_keep_dev() as suggested by Mani
>> - Update all users of this API such as ath12k (previously only ath11k
>> was updated)
>> - Define prev_fw_sz in docs
>> - Do better alignment of comments
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>> - Fix state machine of ath12k by setting ATH12K_MHI_DEINIT with
>> ATH12K_MHI_POWER_OFF_KEEP_DEV state (Thanks Sebastian for testing and
>> finding the problem)
>> - Use static with mhi_power_down_unprepare_keep_dev()
>> - Remove crash log as it was showing that kworker wasn't able to
>> allocate memory.
>>
>> Changes since v4:
>> - Update desctiption
>
> While I'm commenting on spelling, "description"
>
>
> Code looks ok to me. I think we just need to hash out some of the
> documentation and this will be good to go.
Thanks
>
--
Regards,
Usama
Powered by blists - more mailing lists