[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <474892bc-8c70-4b3d-8835-473f2323496c@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 09:03:57 +0800
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Liang@...gle.com,
Kan <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@...el.com>,
Xiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@...el.com>, Eranian Stephane <eranian@...gle.com>,
Shukla Manali <Manali.Shukla@....com>,
Nikunj Dadhania <nikunj.dadhania@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 22/38] KVM: x86/pmu: Optimize intel/amd_pmu_refresh()
helpers
On 5/16/2025 3:22 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025, Dapeng Mi wrote:
>> On 5/15/2025 8:37 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
>>>> index 153972e944eb..eba086ef5eca 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
>>>> @@ -198,12 +198,20 @@ static void __amd_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>> pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters = min_t(unsigned int, pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters,
>>>> kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp);
>>>>
>>>> - if (pmu->version > 1) {
>>>> - pmu->global_ctrl_rsvd = ~((1ull << pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters) - 1);
>>>> + if (kvm_pmu_cap.version > 1) {
> ARGH!!!!! I saw the pmu->version => kvm_pmu_cap.version change when going through
> this patch, but assumed it was simply a refactoring bug and ignored it.
>
> Nope, 100% intentional, as I discovered after spending the better part of an hour
> debugging. Stuffing pmu->global_ctrl when it doesn't exist is necessary when the
> mediated PMU is enabled, because pmu->global_ctrl will always be loaded in hardware.
> And so loading '0' means the PMU is effectively disabled, because KVM disallows the
> guest from writing the MSR.
>
> _That_ is the type of thing that absolutely needs a comment and a lengthy explanation
> in the changelog.
Yes, this change is intended. As long as HW supports Global_CTRL MSR, KVM
should write available value into it at vm-entry regardless of if guest PMU
has GLOBAL_CTRL (pmu version < 2), otherwise guest counters won't be really
enabled on HW.
yeah, it's indeed easily confused and should put a comment here. My fault ...
>
> Intel also needs the same treatment for PMU v1. And since there's no hackery that
> I can see, that suggests PMU v1 guests haven't been tested with the mediated PMU
> on Intel.
>
> I guess congratulations are in order, because this patch just became my new goto
> example of why I'm so strict about on the "one thing per patch" rule.
Embarrassing ....
>
>>> It's not just global_ctrl. PEBS and the fixed counters also depend on v2+ (the
>>> SDM contradicts itself; KVM's ABI is that they're v2+).
>>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * At RESET, AMD CPUs set all enable bits for general purpose counters in
>>>> + * IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL (so that software that was written for v1 PMUs
>>>> + * don't unknowingly leave GP counters disabled in the global controls).
>>>> + * Emulate that behavior when refreshing the PMU so that userspace doesn't
>>>> + * need to manually set PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL.
>>>> + */
>>>> + pmu->global_ctrl = BIT_ULL(pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters) - 1;
>>>> + pmu->global_ctrl_rsvd = ~pmu->global_ctrl;
>>>> pmu->global_status_rsvd = pmu->global_ctrl_rsvd;
>>>> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists