[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCb7f4ziOffNRrkd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 10:46:55 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"open list:AMD HETERO CORE HARDWARE FEEDBACK DRIVER" <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:AMD PSTATE DRIVER" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 03/13] x86/msr-index: define AMD heterogeneous CPU
related MSR
* Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>
>
> Introduces new MSR registers for AMD hardware feedback support.
> These registers enable the system to provide workload classification
> and configuration capabilities.
>
> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index b7dded3c81132..8e6db9a9f53c0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -732,6 +732,11 @@
> #define MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_CTL 0xc0000301
> #define MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS_CLR 0xc0000302
>
> +/* AMD Hardware Feedback Support MSRs */
> +#define AMD_WORKLOAD_CLASS_CONFIG 0xc0000500
> +#define AMD_WORKLOAD_CLASS_ID 0xc0000501
> +#define AMD_WORKLOAD_HRST 0xc0000502
Can we follow the existing pattern of MSR_AMD64_* or MSR_AMD_* that 99%
of the indices in this header are following?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists