linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add support for camss

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <020576a8-8edb-4d4f-a58e-6cf6e30f6df9@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 11:41:01 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Wenmeng Liu <quic_wenmliu@...cinc.com>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add support for camss

On 16/05/2025 11:32, Wenmeng Liu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2025/5/16 18:15, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 16/05/2025 08:34, Wenmeng Liu wrote:
>>>> This should be 689 yes
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> bod
>>>
>>> Hi Bryan,Konrad,
>>>
>>> I confirmed that the value is 688 instead of 689. The documentation 
>>> incorrectly listed it as 689. To CC linux-media, I have resent the 
>>> patch:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20250516072707.388332-1- 
>>> quic_wenmliu@...cinc.com/
>>
>> Do you mean the documentation in the kernel or the documentation 
>> inside of qcom ?
>>
>> I checked the internal silicon definition, I think Konrad did also.
>>
>> Which documentation do you mean here ?
>>
>> ---
>> bod
> 
> I mean is the ipcat documentation.
> And if configured to 689, the interrupt will fail to request:
> irq：irq: type mismatch, failed to map hwirq-721 for interrupt- 
> controller@...00000!
> 
> According the mobile configuration, this value should be 688.
> 
> Thanks,
> Wenmeng

OK, thank you for clarification.

---
bod