linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/14] Add PPE driver for Qualcomm IPQ9574 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1b209aa2-6399-40d5-9fa9-70a712a57aa2@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 18:59:26 +0800
From: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
        "David S. Miller"
	<davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lei Wei
	<quic_leiwei@...cinc.com>,
        Suruchi Agarwal <quic_suruchia@...cinc.com>,
        Pavithra R <quic_pavir@...cinc.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R.
 Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_kkumarcs@...cinc.com>, <quic_linchen@...cinc.com>,
        <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
        <john@...ozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/14] Add PPE driver for Qualcomm IPQ9574 SoC



On 5/15/2025 10:24 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2025 22:19:11 +0800 Luo Jie wrote:
>> However, from the patchwork result as below, it seems the dependent
>> patch series (for FIELD_MODIFY() macro) did not get picked to validate
>> the PPE driver patch series together. This dependency is mentioned in
>> the cover letter. Could you advise what could be wrong here, which is
>> preventing the dependent patch to be picked up? Thanks.
> 
> Please try to read more about kernel development process.
> These patches are not in Linus's tree or the networking tree.
> If you want to use them you have to wait with your submission
> until after the next merge window.

OK, understand now. I will push the new version after the next
merge window. Thanks for the information.