[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mafs05xi0o9ri.fsf@amazon.de>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 17:28:17 +0200
From: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@...zon.de>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alexander Gordeev
<agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>, "Andy
Lutomirski" <luto@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, "Arnd
Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Brian Cain
<bcain@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Dinh
Nguyen" <dinguyen@...nel.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, "Huacai
Chen" <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiaxun Yang
<jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, "John
Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>, Madhavan Srinivasan
<maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Matt Turner
<mattst88@...il.com>, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>, Michael Ellerman
<mpe@...erman.id.au>, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, Palmer Dabbelt
<palmer@...belt.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "Richard
Weinberger" <richard@....at>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "Stafford
Horne" <shorne@...il.com>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, "Praveen
Kumar" <pravkmr@...zon.de>, <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org>, <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>, <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-openrisc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
<sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/13] arch, mm: set high_memory in free_area_init()
Hi Mike, Andrew,
On Thu, Mar 13 2025, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>
>
> high_memory defines upper bound on the directly mapped memory.
> This bound is defined by the beginning of ZONE_HIGHMEM when a system has
> high memory and by the end of memory otherwise.
>
> All this is known to generic memory management initialization code that
> can set high_memory while initializing core mm structures.
>
> Add a generic calculation of high_memory to free_area_init() and remove
> per-architecture calculation except for the architectures that set and
> use high_memory earlier than that.
>
> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> # x86
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/alpha/mm/init.c | 1 -
> arch/arc/mm/init.c | 2 --
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 2 --
> arch/csky/mm/init.c | 1 -
> arch/hexagon/mm/init.c | 6 ------
> arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c | 1 -
> arch/loongarch/mm/init.c | 2 --
> arch/microblaze/mm/init.c | 2 --
> arch/mips/mm/init.c | 2 --
> arch/nios2/mm/init.c | 6 ------
> arch/openrisc/mm/init.c | 2 --
> arch/parisc/mm/init.c | 1 -
> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 1 -
> arch/s390/mm/init.c | 2 --
> arch/sh/mm/init.c | 7 -------
> arch/sparc/mm/init_32.c | 1 -
> arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 2 --
> arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c | 1 -
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 2 --
> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 3 ---
> arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c | 3 ---
> arch/xtensa/mm/init.c | 2 --
> mm/memory.c | 8 --------
> mm/mm_init.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/nommu.c | 2 --
> 25 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
This patch causes a BUG() when built with CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL and
passing in the cma= commandline parameter:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:23!
ception 0x06 IP 10:ffffffff812ebbf8 error 0 cr2 0xffff88903ffff000
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.15.0-rc6+ #231 PREEMPT(undef)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__phys_addr+0x58/0x60
Code: 01 48 89 c2 48 d3 ea 48 85 d2 75 05 e9 91 52 cf 00 0f 0b 48 3d ff ff ff 1f 77 0f 48 8b 05 20 54 55 01 48 01 d0 e9 78 52 cf 00 <0f> 0b 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
RSP: 0000:ffffffff82803dd8 EFLAGS: 00010006 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
RAX: 000000007fffffff RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 000000007fffffff RSI: 0000000280000000 RDI: ffffffffffffffff
RBP: ffffffff82803e68 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffffffff83153180 R11: ffffffff82803e48 R12: ffffffff83c9aed0
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000001040000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:0000000000000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: ffff88903ffff000 CR3: 0000000002838000 CR4: 00000000000000b0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __cma_declare_contiguous_nid+0x6e/0x340
? cma_declare_contiguous_nid+0x33/0x70
? dma_contiguous_reserve_area+0x2f/0x70
? setup_arch+0x6f1/0x870
? start_kernel+0x52/0x4b0
? x86_64_start_reservations+0x29/0x30
? x86_64_start_kernel+0x7c/0x80
? common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141
The reason is that __cma_declare_contiguous_nid() does:
highmem_start = __pa(high_memory - 1) + 1;
If dma_contiguous_reserve_area() (or any other CMA declaration) is
called before free_area_init(), high_memory is uninitialized. Without
CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL, it will likely work but use the wrong value for
highmem_start.
Among the architectures this patch touches, the below call
dma_contiguous_reserve_area() _before_ free_area_init():
- x86
- s390
- mips
- riscv
- xtensa
- loongarch
- csky
The below call it _after_ free_area_init():
- arm64
And the below don't call it at all:
- sparc
- nios2
- openrisc
- hexagon
- sh
- um
- alpha
One possible fix would be to move the calls to
dma_contiguous_reserve_area() after free_area_init(). On x86, it would
look like the diff below. The obvious downside is that moving the call
later increases the chances of allocation failure. I'm not sure how much
that actually matters, but at least on x86, that means crash kernel and
hugetlb reservations go before DMA reservation. Also, adding a patch
like that at rc7 is a bit risky.
The other option would be to revert this. I tried a revert, but it isn't
trivial. It runs into merge conflicts in pretty much all of the arch
files. Maybe reverting patches 11, 12, and 13 as well would make it
easier but I didn't try that.
Which option should we take? If we want to move
dma_contiguous_reserve_area() a bit further down the line then I can
send a patch doing that on the rest of the architectures. Otherwise I
can try my hand at the revert.
--- 8< ---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 9d2a13b37833..ca6928dde0c9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1160,7 +1160,6 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
x86_flattree_get_config();
initmem_init();
- dma_contiguous_reserve(max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT);
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES)) {
hugetlb_cma_reserve(PUD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
@@ -1178,6 +1177,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
x86_init.paging.pagetable_init();
+ dma_contiguous_reserve(max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT);
+
kasan_init();
/*
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Amazon Web Services Development Center Germany GmbH
Tamara-Danz-Str. 13
10243 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 257764 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 365 538 597
Powered by blists - more mailing lists