[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250517151455.1065363-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 17:14:53 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] futex: Use RCU_INIT_POINTER() in futex_mm_init().
There is no need for an explicit NULL pointer initialisation plus a
comment why it is okay. RCU_INIT_POINTER() can be used for NULL
initialisations and it is documented.
This has been build tested with gcc version 9.3.0 (Debian 9.3.0-22) on a
x86-64 defconfig.
Fixes: 094ac8cff7858 ("futex: Relax the rcu_assign_pointer() assignment of mm->futex_phash in futex_mm_init()")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
include/linux/futex.h | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/futex.h b/include/linux/futex.h
index 168ffd5996b48..005b040c4791b 100644
--- a/include/linux/futex.h
+++ b/include/linux/futex.h
@@ -88,14 +88,7 @@ void futex_hash_free(struct mm_struct *mm);
static inline void futex_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- /*
- * No need for rcu_assign_pointer() here, as we can rely on
- * tasklist_lock write-ordering in copy_process(), before
- * the task's MM becomes visible and the ->futex_phash
- * becomes externally observable:
- */
- mm->futex_phash = NULL;
-
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(mm->futex_phash, NULL);
mutex_init(&mm->futex_hash_lock);
}
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists