[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250517172954.GA1239@sol>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 10:29:54 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/10] nvme-tcp: use crc32c() and
skb_copy_and_crc32c_datagram_iter()
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 12:58:35PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > #include "nvme.h"
> > #include "fabrics.h"
> > @@ -166,12 +166,12 @@ struct nvme_tcp_queue {
> > bool rd_enabled;
> > bool hdr_digest;
> > bool data_digest;
> > bool tls_enabled;
> > - struct ahash_request *rcv_hash;
> > - struct ahash_request *snd_hash;
> > + u32 rcv_crc;
> > + u32 snd_crc;
> > __le32 exp_ddgst;
> > __le32 recv_ddgst;
>
> Let's call it rcv_dgst (recv digest) and snd_dgst (send digest).
> Other than that, looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
rcv_dgst would be awfully close to recv_ddgst which holds the on-wire digest
that is received. I think I slightly prefer *_crc, since that helps
differentiate the in-progress values from the finalized values.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists